Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education ; : 405-414, 2023.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-1000953

ABSTRACT

Purpose@#This study used a descriptive investigative design to compare the educational needs and priorities of education-dedicated nurses and preceptors regarding clinical nurse educator competency. @*Methods@#A survey was conducted from March to April 2023 with 308 participants, including 140 education-dedicated nurses and 168 preceptors. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and a paired t-test with the IBM SPSS 26.0 program. For the purpose of analyzing educational needs, we further analyzed data through the Borich needs assessment and the locus for focus model. @*Results@#Among the clinical nurse educator competency, both education-dedicated nurses and preceptors identified “new theory and practice” as the highest priority educational need. Additionally, education-dedicated nurses prioritized “teaching design ability,” “teaching evaluation ability,” and “evidence-based nursing/practice and research,” while preceptors prioritized “clinical nursing knowledge” and “professional development ability” as their educational needs. @*Conclusion@#While both education-dedicated nurses and preceptors responded that education is necessary for all the competency areas required of clinical nurse educators, variations were observed in their reported educational needs and priorities. Thus, it is imperative to develop and implement a differentiated education program for enhancing the competency of clinical nurse educators that considers the distinct requirements of education-dedicated nurses and preceptors.

2.
Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamental Nursing ; : 117-126, 2019.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-764636

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to develop a handoff education program for nursing students and examine the effects of it on nursing students'self-efficacy, communication ability, and clinical performance ability. METHODS: A quasi-experimental design was used with a nonequivalent control group pretest-posttest method. The experimental group (n=31) received handoff education using SBAR; the control group (n=31) received non-SBAR handoff education. Self-efficacy, communication ability, clinical performance ability were measured to evaluate the effects of the program. RESULTS: The experimental group showed significant improvements in self-efficacy (p<.001), and communication ability (p=.025) compared to the control group. However, there was no significant difference in the clinical performance ability between the groups (p=.618). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the handoff education program using SBAR is effective in improving nursing students'self-efficacy and communication ability.


Subject(s)
Humans , Communication , Education , Methods , Nursing , Patient Handoff , Self Efficacy , Students, Nursing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL